Empowering Construction Success Through Expert Engineering Services
A Family of Companies with Over 26 Years of Expertise
MatriScope Engineering Laboratories, Inc. has proudly served the construction industry in Northern and Central California for over 26 years. Founded in 1995, we have evolved into a trusted partner offering comprehensive construction support services across various disciplines. As a certified Small Business Enterprise, we take pride in delivering exceptional client service and tailored solutions to meet your unique project needs.
Our Expertise
Our team of experienced professionals offers diverse expertise in:
1. Materials Testing
- Concrete and masonry testing
- Asphalt and pavement testing
- soil testing
- Chemical testing
2. Construction Inspection
- Quality control and quality assurance assessments
- Building code compliance inspections
- Progress and completion documentation
3. Geotechnical Engineering
- Soil and foundation analysis
- Seismic evaluations
- Slope stability assessments
Beyond the Services
At MatriScope, we prioritize:
- Proactive Project Management: We actively engage with clients to understand their specific needs and develop customized plans.
- Innovative Practices: Our engineers and technicians stay current with the latest technological advancements to ensure optimal solutions.
- Effective Communication: We maintain clear and consistent communication throughout the project lifecycle to ensure transparency and collaboration.
Why Choose MatriScope?
- Established reputation for excellence in the construction industry
- Extensive experience across multiple disciplines
- State-of-the-art laboratory facilities
- Client-focused approach with exceptional communication
- Commitment to quality, safety, and ethical practices
Join us in building a stronger, more resilient future. Contact us today to discuss how MatriScope Engineering Laboratories, Inc. can support your next project!
Unreliable Business Practices
The reviewer, Tango N., had a negative experience with the company, citing a discrepancy in the quoted and final prices. Ahmed provided a quote of $575, but the final charge was $750. According to the reviewer, Scott Edwards claimed that the initial quote was an estimate, whereas the reviewer understood it to be a fixed price.
Concerns with Transparency and Communication
The reviewer felt misled and expressed frustration that they had specifically asked for a final cost before signing the project, implying a lack of transparency and clear communication from the company.
